/arc:vision
Project north star
—What it does
Vision turns a vague product, codebase, or initiative into a concise project north star. It inspects existing project context before asking questions, then creates, reviews, or revises docs/vision.md so future humans and agents have a concrete decision reference.
—Why it exists
Projects drift when their purpose is implicit. A good vision document is short enough to read, specific enough to guide implementation, and honest about constraints, non-goals, and unresolved assumptions.
—Design decisions
- —Inspect the codebase before asking questions.
- —Do not run a long interview when existing context is enough for a credible draft.
- —Include non-goals and decision principles so the document can resolve tradeoffs.
- —Keep the artifact focused on docs/vision.md unless the user specifies another path.
Source document
<arc_runtime> This workflow requires the full Arc bundle, not a prompts-only install.
Paths in this skill use these conventions:
agents/...,references/...,disciplines/...,templates/...,scripts/...,rules/...,skills/<name>/...are Arc-owned files at the plugin root. Resolve the plugin root from this skill's filesystem location — it's the directory containingagents/andskills/../...is local to this skill's directory..ruler/...,docs/...,src/..., or any project-relative path refers to the user's project repository. </arc_runtime>
Vision Workflow
Create, review, or revise a project vision document. The output should be useful to future humans and agents: specific enough to guide decisions, short enough to be read, and honest about constraints.
Start
When invoked:
- State that you are using
/arc:vision. - Determine whether the user wants to create, review, or revise a vision.
- Inspect existing project context before asking questions.
- Ask one focused question at a time only when the direction is still unclear.
Context To Inspect
Read what exists from this list. Do not fail if a file is absent:
docs/vision.mddocs/arc/vision.mdREADME.mdAGENTS.mdCONTEXT.mddocs/brand-system.mddocs/design-context.mdpackage.json- app, package, or domain folder names that reveal the product shape
If docs/vision.md exists and the user did not specify a mode, ask:
AskUserQuestion:
question: "I found an existing vision document. What would you like to do?"
header: "Existing Vision"
options:
- label: "Review"
description: "Assess the current vision and suggest improvements without overwriting it"
- label: "Revise"
description: "Update the vision based on current context or a new direction"
- label: "Start fresh"
description: "Replace it with a new vision document"
If no existing vision exists and the user's intent is clear, draft from available context. Do not force a long interview.
Useful Questions
Ask only the questions needed to fill real gaps:
- What is the project?
- Who is it for?
- What problem does it solve?
- What should be true if it succeeds?
- What should it deliberately not become?
- What constraints should future work respect?
- What tradeoffs should future decisions optimize for?
Output
Create or update docs/vision.md by default unless the user specifies another path.
Use this structure unless the project already has a better local convention:
# Vision
## What This Is
## Who It Serves
## Why It Exists
## Success
## Principles
## Non-Goals
## Open Questions
A good Arc vision document normally fits in 500-900 words.
Writing Rules
- Describe the actual product, audience, and value, not a generic category.
- Prefer concrete nouns and decision language over marketing claims.
- Include non-goals. A vision without boundaries is not operational.
- Include decision principles that can resolve future tradeoffs.
- Separate facts from assumptions when the codebase or user input does not fully support a claim.
- Avoid hype phrases such as "revolutionary", "seamless", "cutting-edge", or "delightful" unless the product context proves they are precise.
- Do not invent business metrics, customer segments, compliance requirements, or committed timelines.
- Do not add broad documentation files beyond the requested vision artifact.
- Keep open questions explicit when direction depends on unresolved assumptions.
Review Mode
When reviewing an existing vision, lead with issues:
- Missing or vague audience.
- Unclear problem statement.
- No observable success criteria.
- No non-goals or constraints.
- Claims contradicted by the codebase.
- Language too generic to guide implementation.
- Decision principles that are slogans rather than usable tradeoff rules.
If the user asked only for a review, do not overwrite the file. Provide findings and a proposed revision excerpt instead.
Revise Mode
When revising:
- Preserve accurate, specific claims from the existing document.
- Replace generic or outdated claims with codebase-backed language.
- Mark assumptions rather than presenting them as facts.
- Keep the document concise even when the project is complex.
- Save the final revision to
docs/vision.mdunless the user specified another path.
Save
When creating or revising:
mkdir -p docs
# Write to docs/vision.md unless another path was requested.
Commit the vision document when the user has asked Arc to own the change or when continuing an Arc workflow where committing is expected:
git add docs/vision.md
git commit -m "docs: update project vision"
Interop
/arc:ideatereads vision for product and scope context./arc:launchchecks whether launch posture still matches the project intent.
<completion_check> Before finishing, verify that the vision:
- Names the product and audience.
- Explains why the project exists.
- Gives future agents enough context to make implementation decisions.
- Includes non-goals or constraints.
- Includes decision principles that can resolve tradeoffs.
- Lists open questions when the vision depends on unresolved assumptions. </completion_check>